Adhikari S, Blaivas M, Morrison D, Lander L. “Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines.” J Ultrasound Med. 2010 May;29(5):741-7.
Bauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med 2009 Feb;27(2):135-140.
Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005 Nov;46(5):456-461.
Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009 Mar;25(3):154-159.
Panebianco NL, Fredette JM, Szyld D, Sagalyn EB, Pines JM, Dean AJ. “What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access.” Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1298-303.
Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, et al. Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med 2010 Mar;28(3):343-347.
